[CVALE] ***SPAM*** (4.1) Re: Router Recommendation

Ian Sterling xyverz at gmail.com
Sat Aug 8 11:40:17 PDT 2009


YES!  Finally something good coming OUT of the porcelain throne!

I remember when google posted this.  Not quite as good as
IP-over-Carrier-Pigeon, but still quite fun to read.

--Ian...

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Bent Wizard<bent_wizard at yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.google.com/tisp/
>
> hi Patrirc have you seen this ?
>
> Russ
>
> --- On Fri, 7/24/09, Patrick Bennett <stnick at bennettbungalow.com> wrote:
>
> From: Patrick Bennett <stnick at bennettbungalow.com>
> Subject: Re: [CVALE] ***SPAM*** (4.1) Re: Router Recommendation
> To: cvale at cvale.org
> Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 3:12 PM
>
> On my read the exploit bypasses authentication altogether, making the
> weakness or strength of the password is a mute point).  No?
>
>     -Patrick
>
>
> Ian Sterling wrote:
>> You can also avoid this problem by changing the default admin password
>> to something stronger. :-)
>>
>> --Ian...
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2009, at 14:56, Patrick Bennett
>> <stnick at bennettbungalow.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> FYI.  Remote exploit found in DD-WRT (not sure if only v24 sp1) -
>>> http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/9209 .  The simple step of making the
>>> info page and admin interface inaccessible on the WAN ought to fix
>>> (the
>>> example exploit seems to not work on my own router under these
>>> conditions anyway).
>>>
>>>    -Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> Patrick Bennett wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fantastic Rick.  Enjoy!
>>>>
>>>>    -Patrick
>>>>
>>>> Rick Knight wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Spam detection software, running on the system
>>>>> "mail.rlknight.com", has
>>>>> identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
>>>>> message
>>>>> has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
>>>>> label
>>>>> similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
>>>>> defang at rlknight.com for details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Content preview:  Thanks everyone for the recommendation. My
>>>>> Buffalo WHR-HP-54G
>>>>>   with DD-WRT pre-flashed arrived yesterday and I set it up last
>>>>> night. It
>>>>>  works beautifully. Mail is arriving at my server with the headers
>>>>> intact so
>>>>>   grey-listing is working and my spam is WAY down. Most important,
>>>>> I realized
>>>>>   my mail server had become an open relay. The new router took
>>>>> care of that
>>>>>   as well. [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Content analysis details:   (4.1 points, 3.6 required)
>>>>>
>>>>> pts rule name              description
>>>>> ---- ----------------------
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via
>>>>> SMTP
>>>>> 5.5 AWL                    AWL: From: address is in the auto white-
>>>>> list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> ---
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cvale mailing list
>>>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cvale mailing list
>>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cvale mailing list
>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cvale mailing list
>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cvale mailing list
> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cvale mailing list
> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>
>



More information about the cvale mailing list