[CVALE] Router Recommendation

[Rick Knight]

Patrick Bennett wrote:
> Is this what you're looking for?  
> http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/One-to-one_NAT
>
> Most of the documentation is done on the wiki: 
> http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>
>     -Patrick
>
>
> Rick Knight wrote:
>   
>> Patrick and Ian, Thanks for the replies.
>>
>> Ian, will DD-WRT allow me to NAT to an internal IP based on destination 
>> port or service? I can't seem to find a feature list or English 
>> documentation on the DD-WRT site.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>> Ian Sterling wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I will second the nomination for DD-WRT. I've Bren using it for nearly  
>>> two years now and love the hell out of it.
>>>
>>> Only thing for me is that I'm considering building a low-power box to  
>>> put pFSense on and use that as a router.  There are things I want that  
>>> ddwrt won't do like nat to different internal IPs from the same  
>>> external address bases on the incing hostname.
>>>
>>> Other than that, I love my WRT54GL + DD-WRT.
>>>
>>> --Ian...
>>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2009, at 12:06, Patrick Bennett  
>>> <stnick at bennettbungalow.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Rick, I *think* a linksys wrtg5gl or buffalo whr54g router re-flashed
>>>> with dd-wrt firmware will do what you want.  You should check out the
>>>> dd-wrt site (http://www.dd-wrt.com) for specific information about the
>>>> capabilities you're asking about.  In my own experience, these
>>>> re-flashed routers run way better and way more stable than they do off
>>>> the shelf and have tons more features to boot.
>>>>
>>>> My favorite hardware to use with dd-wrt is this one:
>>>> http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=844208
>>>>
>>>>    -Patrick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rick Knight wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> I have been using a slackware box with IPtables as my router,  
>>>>> firewall
>>>>> and PPPoE connector for some time now, but due to the rising cost of
>>>>> energy, a desire to be a bit more "green" and the aging of the  
>>>>> server, I
>>>>> want to drop the PC in favor of a wireless router. I have a ZyXel  
>>>>> P-330W
>>>>> wireless router that works well except for email. I run my own mail
>>>>> server behind my firewall. Using the slackware box, smtp traffic  
>>>>> arrived
>>>>> at the mail server with the headers intact. Using the router, I  
>>>>> have to
>>>>> port forward traffic to the mail server. This modifies the header so
>>>>> that all mail appears to come from my firewall. That plays heck with
>>>>> milter-grreylist. So, I need an inexpensive wireless router that will
>>>>> allow smtp port 25 traffic to be NAT'd to the mail server and still  
>>>>> let
>>>>> me port forward other services like HTTP, HTTPS and FTP as well as
>>>>> custom services like Readerware or VNC and will also manage the PPPoE
>>>>> connection to my DSL modem. Can anyone recommend such a beast?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rick
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cvale mailing list
>>>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cvale mailing list
>>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cvale mailing list
>>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> cvale mailing list
>> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
>> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>>   
>>     
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cvale mailing list
> cvale at lists.fire2wire.com
> http://lists.fire2wire.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/cvale
>   
Thanks Patrick,

I didn't see a link to the wiki on the DD-WRT site, but a Google search 
did turn it up.

That is exactly what I'm looking for.

Thanks again,
Rick